Xiaomi Mi 10 was directly divided into the standard version and the Pro version at the beginning of the release, and in the past, the digital series was generally released first, and other models were released as upgraded versions after a period of time. The main difference between the standard version and the Pro version of Xiaomi Mi 10 is the camera module,The standard version has two macro and depth of field cameras,The Pro version is8000000000 telephoto and12000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
In terms of ID appearance, the Xiaomi Mi 10 series is very similar to the previous CC9 Pro, with four camera modules like exclamation marks behind them, although there are no features, but in 2020, it looks very concise in a bunch of mahjong-type rear camera modules. The standard version and the Pro version are made of different back shells, the standard version is glossy glass, which is easier to stain fingerprints, and the back of the Pro version is made of AG frosted glass, which feels very delicate and is not easy to stain fingerprints.
In terms of other hardware,Xiaomi Mi 10This time the stacking is more forceful,Dual stereo speakers of equal size on the left and right、Horizontal linear motor with a slightly flawed feel but acceptable experience、Conventional infrared and NFC are readily available,It also supportWiFi-6,Basically, the current mature technology is carried,Nothing is missing。
Although they are stereo dual speakers,But the size of the speakers of the standard version and the Pro version is not the same,The standard version is1.0cc,The Pro version is1.2cc,The difference in size is not too big,There are obvious differences in sound quality in the early stage,The Pro version can even be called a music phone,The standard version is mediocre。 In the latest firmware version, the standard version has improved the performance of the midrange, and the gap has been reduced compared to the previous period.
The front screen is a 6.67-inch FHD punch-hole curved screen with a 90Hz refresh rate and DC dimming. The perforation is in the upper left corner, the area is very small, but because of the arc edge of the surface, the position is slightly to the right, and the appearance is not coordinated, if the perforation is in the middle, it will at least be more symmetrical. The suppliers of the standard version and the Pro version are slightly different, the standard version is Samsung A screen in the early stage, and the follow-up will be supplied by Huaxing Optoelectronics as the second supply, and the Pro version is all supplied by Samsung.
In terms of screen quality,Xiaomi Mi 10The difference between the standard version and the Pro version of the basic disk is not big,The gap is mainly manifested in the color accuracy,ProThe version will be calibrated separately before leaving the factory,JNCD is below0.55,The average Delta E is lower than1.1,The color accuracy performance is very good,The average Delta E of the standard version is1.8-1.9 or so,Although it is not as good as the Pro version,But the average Delta E is lower than2,The color shift is not easy to detect in daily use。
In terms of performance, the Xiaomi 10 series debuted Snapdragon 865 and LPDDR5 memory in China, and finally used UFS 3.0 flash memory, and the hardware configuration belongs to the top level of the Android camp. The Snapdragon 865 uses the Kryo 585 architecture, 7nm FFP process, one large core, three medium cores and four small cores, and the GPU is Adreno 650. In Geekbench5, the Snapdragon 865 has a single-core score of 900 and a multi-core score of 3300, while the Kirin 990 5G has a single-core score of 760 and a multi-core score of 3100. In the GFXBench Mark, which reflects the performance of the GPU, the Manhattan off-screen rendering of the Snapdragon 865 is about 10 frames higher than that of the Kirin 990 5G version, the rendering of the T-Rex is 50 frames higher, and the performance in the Aztec ruins is not much different, with only 1 frame difference in 1440P and 5 frames in 1080P.
The standard version of the memory provider is SanDisk, the Pro version is Samsung, Samsung memory is 200MB/s faster than SanDisk sequential reads, 100MB/s faster sequential writes, and random reads and writes are not much different.
Taking pictures is also an obvious aspect of the gap between the Xiaomi Mi 10 standard version and the Pro version, although the main camera of both is Samsung S5KHMX, but the standard version is a 7P lens, and the Pro version is an 8P lens. There are also big differences in the earlier firmware versions, with the Pro version being exclusive to the DXO Mark firmware for a while before the standard version was upgraded to this firmware, and after upgrading to the latest firmware, the main difference between the standard and Pro versions is not on the main camera, but on the ultra-wide and telephoto. The standard version has an ultra-wide angle of only 13 million pixels, which is less than the 20 million pixels of the Pro version, and the telephoto can only be cropped with the main camera, which is also far inferior to the OV08A10 of the Pro version with optical image stabilization.
In terms of system, it is still MIUI 11, with comprehensive functions, unified design language, and it is also easy to use, and the biggest slot is still advertising. The role of one-click ads is still limited, and users need to manually turn off ad push one by one. This is not a problem on the Redmi model, but the price of the Xiaomi digital series has increased significantly this time, and it is gradually moving towards the high-end, and reducing advertising for users of this model can significantly improve the user experience.
The Xiaomi Mi 10 standard version is stuffed with a 4780mAh battery, which is 210mAh more than the Pro version, and it supports up to 50W fast charging, but it only comes standard with a 30W charger, and the 50W charger needs to be purchased separately. Both 30W and 50W chargers can be fully charged in 1 hour, and the difference is not particularly large. Both the Pro version and the standard version support 30W wireless fast charging, and fast charging can also be carried out during fragmented times, and the time to fully charge is about 75 minutes.