Meizu 17 series belongs to the distribution of conventional products,A standard version and a Pro version,The main difference between the two is not in the running performance,But in the camera hardware and back cover material,The Pro version will have a 32 million pixel ultra-wide-angle lens,The back cover is made of ceramic,The ultra-wide angle of the standard version is8 million pixels,The back cover is AG frosted glass,The Pro version supports27W wireless charging,The standard version only supports 30W wired charging。

Appearance has always been a major selling point of the Meizu digital series,Meizu17 ProNo exception,Although it did not use the curved screen that is more popular now,But a white panel is used,Maybe it is the only model that uses a white panel this year,The flat screen has no curved reflection and mistouch,The film is also convenient,There is nothing bad。 The punch screen is considered the mainstream scheme this year,But the hole of Meizu is hit in the upper right,And the reading and viewing direction is from left to right,Plus the aperture is small enough,And the ring power is made at the punch hole,So it really doesn't affect the perception too much,It's much better than the big pill like P40 Pro。

Meizu 17 Pro is also one of the few models that use a ceramic back cover this year, the back cover has azure, white, and Ugin three colors, of which the texture of azure and white is the most prominent, the feel is very moist, and it is not easy to be contaminated with fingerprints, it is one of the few models that recommend not wearing a phone case. The transition between the back cover and the middle frame is very smooth, with little to no sense of passage.

The use of ceramic materials will inevitably increase the weight of the fuselage,Meizu16SThe weight is165grams,In the 5G era,Meizu17 ProWith ceramic back cover,Meizu17 ProIt has reached 222 grams,After wearing the shell film, it is a proper half-catty machine,But fortunately17 ProThe weight distribution is good,The top and bottom are relatively balanced,There will be no Sony Xperia 1The feeling of being top-heavy in your hand。

There's not much to say about the screen,In addition to the second smallest digging hole,FHD、90HzRefresh rate、SamsungE3Luminous materials are already very familiar,The follow-up will be upgraded to 120HzRefresh rate through OTA,And it's supported by hardware,It's a small easter egg。 The color accuracy and brightness are not too eye-catching, with a manual maximum brightness of 500 nits, an all-white excitation brightness of 700 nits, and a local excitation brightness of 800 nits, which is considered a normal performance.

In terms of other configurations, the linear motor and dual speakers are Meizu's consistent insistence, and Meizu's tuning of the linear motor is very in place, and the vibration feedback is very comfortable and crisp, which belongs to the top level of Android. In terms of speakers, since this year's Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro uses fully symmetrical dual speakers, and the Meizu is still above the earpiece speaker, it is slightly inferior in terms of surround sound.

In terms of performance, as the latest flagship machine in the first half of the year, the Meizu 17 Pro is fully configured, and the Snapdragon 865 UFS 3.1 flash memory LPDDR5 memory three-piece set is very complete, and the tuning has not overturned, and all running scores and game performance can basically play normally.

In terms of photography, it has unexpectedly become a shortcoming of the Meizu 17 Pro, because this time the main camera and telephoto of the whole series are not equipped with optical image stabilization, which can be experienced from both the book and the actual experience. The shortcomings on the books are mainly due to the fact that the flagship models of the same period are basically equipped with optical image stabilization, which can be said to be the standard configuration of the flagship model, and the Meizu 17 Pro will naturally fall into the hands of people without the standard configuration. The shortcomings in the experience are mainly in night scene shooting and video shooting, and the lack of optical image stabilization will lead to low film yield and video image shaking, which is also a significant regression in experience compared to Meizu 16S.

In addition to the configuration of optical image stabilization, the Meizu 17 Pro's sensor specifications are not bad, the main camera is SonyIMX686, the ultra-wide angle is Sony's custom sensor, the model is IMX616, and the telephoto lens is more common, it is OV08A10, and there is no optical image stabilization.

In the previous firmware version,Meizu17 ProThere are certain deficiencies in the photo performance,The advantage of the main camera is that the white balance and exposure are very accurate,There is no color cast,The film comes with a little filter,The degree of adjustment is well grasped,The disadvantage is that the large light ratio scene uses HDR mode will have dark details and more noise,The resolution is not as good as the 100 million pixel CMOS or customized IMX689 in the flagship model,It belongs to the type with good perception but not good definition。 In night shooting, due to the lack of optical image stabilization, there is a significant gap between the main camera's imaging and the flagship models of the same class, especially in the noise in the shadows and the clarity of the light signs.

The ultra-wide angle is a selling point of the Meizu 17 Pro, with an equivalent focal length of 15mm, and the shooting angle is the widest among the current flagship models, reaching 123°, and the visual impact is very strong when shooting landscapes and buildings, but it is also due to the fact that the optimization is not in place, the shooting is still relatively blurry, the purity is relatively poor, and the smear marks are relatively heavy, and the advantage of 32 million pixels is not reflected, and the effect is difficult to be satisfactory.

In terms of telephoto,Meizu17 ProChanged from the previous IMX350 to OV08A10,This sensor is a very mature product,The effect can be said to be the best among the three cameras,But it still has no optical image stabilization,So pay attention to hand shaking when shooting,Especially in low-light scenes,The film yield and fault tolerance rate are still low compared to other models。

In terms of system,Meizu17 ProFlyme8.1,That is, the bottom layer is upgraded from Android9 to Android10,This system is easy to use and easy to use,Because there are many functions that are more intimate,For example, what kind of small window2.0、mBack and the like,But Flyme has always been the title of Bugme,And there are many function optimizations that are not in place,It often drops frames and freezes,It makes people feel that this system is not stable。 For ordinary users,Flyme system advertising can be said to be the most in the Android camp,Although MIUI has a lot of ads,But after MIUI is upgraded to 12,It has opened a segment with Flyme,And the close button of the ad is also easier to find than Flyme。

In terms of battery life, the Meizu 17 Pro uses a 4500mAh battery, plus OneMind upgraded to 4.0, which has a strong sense of optimization of battery life and energy saving, and there is basically no battery life anxiety after one day of use. In terms of charging, 30W charging is considered a lower middle level in the flagship camp, and the actual power is only 25W, which can be charged to 53% in half an hour and 86% in an hour, and then the charging power drops, and it takes 96 minutes to fully charge.

The Meizu 17 Pro also supports 27W wireless charging, which can be charged to 39% in 30 minutes, although the overall charging speed is not as good as wired charging, but as a daily on-the-go charging scenario, this speed is already very good.