Like many models at the same price,Reno 3It is also divided into standard version and Pro version,Standard version8 128The starting price is3399element,Proversion8 128The starting price is3999element,The two are very different in SoC、Screen、Photography module and5G baseband,It's two different models。
The standard version and the Pro version of the Reno 3 are not one high and one low, because the standard version of the Dimensity 1000L is better than the Pro version of the Snapdragon 765G in many data, and the standard version of the IMX686 is also one level higher than the Pro version of the IMX586, so these two versions are more like an exploration in two directions.
In terms of appearance, Reno 3There are no outstanding highlights, the front is an ordinary water drop screen, and the back is a vertical row of four cameras in the upper left corner, the Pro version is the main long and wide plus 2 million black and white number cameras, and the standard version is the main camera ultra wide angle plus two 2 million number cameras. The front and back sides are Corning Gorilla Glass 5, the middle frame is made of plastic, and the connection between the back cover and the middle frame is relatively sleek, which is not awkward. Weight is a big selling point, at a time when friends are often more than 200g, the standard version of Reno 3 is only 181g, and the Pro version is only 171g, which is indeed relatively light to use.
In terms of other configurations, Reno 3 still uses a rotor vibration motor and a single speaker, which doesn't seem to match the price, but the glory V30 Pro and Huawei nova 6 at this price are also rotor motors and single speakers, if you want a better vibration and speaker, you have to find a 4G model at the same price. The 3.5mm headphone jack is retained, which is relatively rare in the same price range.
In terms of screen, both versions of the Reno 3 are Samsung AMOLED, but the standard version is a waterdrop straight screen, and the Pro version is a 90Hz cut-out curved screen. There is also a gap in the comprehensive quality of the two,The supply chain taste of the standard version of this Samsung A screen is still relatively strong,Full screen brightness430nits,Pentile arrangement408PPI,Good look,It's just that the blue-green is slightly oversaturated。 The Pro version of the screen uses Samsung's latest E3 light-emitting material, with a full-screen brightness of up to 800 nits, a peak brightness of up to 1100 nits, and a 90Hz refresh rate, and the smoothness will be much better than the standard version, but the experience of the curved screen will still be worse than the straight screen on OnePlus7T.
In terms of performance, the Reno 3 standard version debuted MediaTek's Dimensity 1000L, four 2.2GHz large cores, four 2.0GHz small cores, the GPU is Mali G77-MP7, integrated M70 5G baseband, compared with the Dimensity 1000 The main frequency is reduced, and the GPU is downgraded from MP9 to MP7. The Dimensity 1000L has a single-core score of 3300 and a multi-core score of 9900 on Geekbench4, compared to a single-core score of 2800 and a multi-core score of 7700 on the Kirin 810. In Geekbench5, the Dimensity 1000L has 670 single-core and 2700 multi-core, and for comparison, the Snapdragon 765G has 620 single-core and 1800 multi-core. In terms of mid-range processors, the Dimensity 1000L's CPU score is higher than that of the Kirin 810 and Snapdragon 765G.
In terms of GPU scores, the Dimensity 1000L is in GFXBench, the Manhattan 3.1 off-screen frame rate is 53FPS, the Manhattan off-screen is 82FPS, and the Tyrannosaurus Rex off-screen is 141FPS, and as a comparison, the three numbers of Snapdragon 845 are 60, 82, and 151 respectively, it can be said that the GPU performance of the Dimensity 1000L is very close to the Snapdragon 845, and it is also the 5G mid-range SoC with the best performance at present, and the theoretical performance is better than that of Kirin 810 and Snapdragon 765G.
In terms of photography, although the IMX686 of the Reno 3 standard version is an upgraded version of the Pro version IMX586, it should also be taken into account that OPPO uses the new MediaTek platform, which is not as mature as the Snapdragon platform in terms of tuning, and the main camera of the Pro version has optical image stabilization, and the standard version only has electronic image stabilization.
In actual shooting, the performance of the standard version is indeed inferior to the IMX586 model with optical image stabilization, and even inferior to some IMX686 models of the Snapdragon platform, such as the Redmi K30, which is specifically manifested in poor HDR dynamic range performance, the highlights cannot be suppressed, the shadows have no details, and there will be a lot of noise in night shooting, and the highlights are overexposed. There is only electronic image stabilization in the shooting video, and there is a big gap between the effect and the Pro version.
In terms of charging range, the Reno 3 standard version is equipped with a 4025mAh battery, which supports VOOC 4.0 fast charging, with a nominal power of 30W, which can be charged to 50% in 20 minutes and 70% in half an hour, and it takes 50 minutes to fully charge.