Note 7 Pro is an upgraded version of Redmi Note 7,At present, there is only 6 128 one configuration,There is no difference between the color and ID appearance and Note 7,Corning fifth-generation Gorilla Glass is used on the front and back,The middle frame part is made of plastic,The plastic edging of the screen is a little thick,There will be some awkwardness when using full-screen gestures。 The top retains a 3.5mm headphone jack and IR, and the bottom connector is Type-C.
At the press conference, the official emphasized that the Note 7 Pro adopts nano waterproof coating technology, which reduces the corrosion of common liquids on mobile phones, and can also play a role in life waterproofing, but it is not IP68 waterproof, even if you go to IP68 waterproof, it is very dangerous to soak in water for a long time.
The front screen of the Note 7 Pro is a 6.3-inch LCD waterdrop screen, and the supplier is Shenchao, while the Note 7 is a Pegasus. The shape of the water droplets is the same as that of the Note 7, which is very abrupt, and there is a big gap with the shallow notch of the Meizu Note 9's custom screen. Although the Note 7 Pro and Note 7 choose different screen vendors, the overall quality is similar, with a manual max brightness of 520 nits, which is higher than the Meizu Note 9's 400 nits, but slightly lower than the Redmi Note 7. The dimming at the edges of the screen is not noticeable, and you won't notice it if you don't look closely.
The Note 7 Pro's mode with the smallest color cast is the standard mode, with an average deltaE of 3.2, which is lower than the Meizu Note 9's 4.2, but not as good as the Redmi Note 7's 2.4. The advantage of the standard mode is the color accuracy, but the color temperature is on the warm side, only 6300K, and at a glance the screen will feel slightly yellow, while the adaptive display and color enhancement mode are above 7600K. The standard mode also covers 94.4% of the sRGB color gamut lower than the other two modes at 99.3%, so it is difficult to choose a suitable color mode for daily use.
In terms of performance, Note 7 Pro uses Snapdragon 675, and the large-core Geekbench score is around 2400 points, reaching the level of Snapdragon 845, but there is a difference in the multi-core score, Meizu Note 9 is around 6000 points, which is not much different from Note 7's Snapdragon 660, and Note 7 Pro is around 6500.
In terms of game performance, Meizu Note 9 and Redmi Note 7 Pro have different preferences, Meizu Note 9 will adopt a more aggressive scheduling scheme, so that the CPU continues to be in a high-frequency state, the frame rate is higher, but the power consumption will also increase, while the Note 7 Pro's scheduling will be a little smoother, the average frame rate is slightly lower, and the battery life will increase slightly. As for the game battery life of the two, in fact, they are relatively average, this problem mainly comes from the Snapdragon 675 itself, it only adds an A76 large core, but the process has not been improved, compared to 710 and 660, the control of power consumption is indeed not a strong point.
The GPU of the 675 is the Adreno 612, which is an improvement over the Adreno 512 of the 660, but it is a regression compared to the Adreno 615 of the 670. In the Benchmark test, 675 and 660 have each other's wins and losses in each project, there is not much difference, but compared with 710, there is a big gap, if you often play Honkai Impact 3 or stimulate the battlefield This kind of GPU-eating game, it is still recommended to buy the Snapdragon 710 model.
In the daily scene of frequently opening multiple APPs, the Meizu Note 9 will be slightly slower than the Note 7 Pro in the first round, but due to the intelligent freeze 3.0, the Note 9 will have more advantages than the Note 7 Pro in retaining the function of APP background, in contrast, the background management of the Note 7 Pro is more general.
Note 7 Pro's main lens CMOS is IMX586, and Snapdragon 675's Spectra 250L also supports direct 48 million pixel photos, from the perspective of hardware specifications, it will be a little more advanced than the Meizu Note 9 with Samsung GM1, but imaging depends on both hardware and tuning, and Note 7 Pro doesn't seem to have spent much effort on this IMX586.
In daytime imaging, the Note 7 Pro's color reproduction is more accurate, which is a definite advantage, and the overall image purity is better, and the Meizu Note 9 will have a noticeable graininess during the day, with slightly more severe noise, but in some large light ratio samples, the overall picture brightness is not as good as that of the Meizu Note 9, making it difficult to render dark details. In addition, it should be mentioned that at the price of a thousand-yuan machine, the Note 7 Pro has a limited cost in terms of lens module, and there will be a certain phenomenon of purple fringing.
In night imaging, there is a very noticeable gap between the Note 7 Pro with Super Night Scene on and the Note 7 Pro without Super Night Scene. After turning on Super Night Scene, the highlight suppression and shadow details have been greatly improved, which has a great advantage over the Meizu Note 9, which has a great advantage over the Meizu Note 9, in addition to the easy overexposure of the highlights, there is also a serious problem of smearing, and the dark details often appear to be blurred.
MIUI system can now turn off part of the push of advertising,It is difficult to avoid the ads that come with the Xiaomi family bucket,But it is undeniable,Although XiaomiMIUI has more system ads,But in terms of in-depth customization,MIUIThe status among domestic manufacturers is still the first echelon,Full screen gesture operation is also very easy to use,It's just that this background management is really average,There is still a lot of room for optimization。
In terms of charging range, the Note 7 Pro comes with an 18W fast charging head, supports QC3.0 fast charging, and the stable power output is about 15W, and it takes 1 hour and 47 minutes to fully charge this 4000mAh battery, which is almost the same as the Meizu Note 9. The difference in battery life between the two is not obvious, and it is estimated that it is related to the A76 large core power consumption of the Snapdragon 675, and the performance is temporarily inferior to the Snapdragon 660 and Snapdragon 710 models.